August 29, 2010
Sunday mailbag! (I had to Google "Alex P. Keaton.")
Prologue: Assorted Facebook unpleasantries that we will not go into here, because our mommas all read this site and when HIS momma reads this site we would like for her to not go running to Miz Naincy.
From: trey.jones379@gmail.comFrom: wolfbearclownshark
Date: August 29, 2010 12:47:10 AM EDT
To: wolfbearclownshark
Subject: TwitterAre you really that contemptuous of Tea Partiers? I'm too socially liberal to have much common ground with those folks. However, I can manage being friends and acquaintances with the Rush Limbaugh crowd and the Rachel Maddow crowd. Why only limit yourself to folks who think just like you? Seems narrow-minded, intolerant, and a bit cunty. I hope Doug impregnates you with a lil' Alex P. Keaton.
Date: August 29, 2010 10:03:34 AM EDT
To: trey.jones379@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Twitter
The nice thing about Twitter is it's a subscription service. I can choose not to continue reading folks spewing real, actual hate speech, fine football fans though they may be. You can have no frame of reference for what I saw and whom I unfollowed/unfriended yesterday, but if my being put off by old schoolmates calling the President a "fag-nigger" on the internet offends you, that same unfollow button's ready when you are. And congratulations on working up to "cunty." That took moxie!
Have a great day,
Holly
Posted by Nastinchka at August 29, 2010 10:25 AM
If the first clause involves citing self as socially liberal, it inevitably leads to something socially reactionary in the next one. With this deployment of "cunty", the rule holds!
Posted by: Colin at August 29, 2010 01:13 PMIf we deeply disagree and are appalled by people like Rush Limbaugh and this whole diabetic hodgepodge of dog-eared Ayn Rand book fans in possession of the funds to march on Washington, we're being intolerant.
I've really had enough of hearing that.